University News & Insights
19/11/2025 2025-11-26 18:45University News & Insights
University News & Insights

Avoiding Ambiguity: The Courage to Speak Up
I’ve noticed in meetings that silence can be mistaken for agreement. In truth, silence is ambiguous. All too often people nod along and actions are assigned. Only when the work stalls does it become clear that other things took priority, or that barriers previously undiscussed hindered progress — all because someone felt unable to speak up at the time. Silence, even when well-intentioned, can slow progress and weaken trust. That’s why one of the principles in our Culture Code — No Silent Disagreement — matters so much. It’s a reminder that openness isn’t confrontation. It’s a sign of respect. The moment we stop speaking honestly with each other, we lose the chance to make better decisions. Openness means being able to say, I’m not sure this will fit alongside my other priorities, I’m not sure I have the required resources, or I see it differently — without fear that it will be taken personally. Ownership means doing what we’ve committed to, or being transparent early if something changes. Both require trust. At EUB, we’re building a culture that values that kind of honesty. A place where people can disagree, refine ideas together, and still leave the room aligned. It’s not always comfortable — but it’s how progress happens. Universities depend on collaboration. Student admissions, curriculum planning, partnerships — none of it works without shared clarity. When people feel safe to speak up, better ideas surface sooner, and the group becomes stronger. So as we move forward, I hope we continue to make honesty a habit. Not just upward to leadership, but across every level of the university. Because when people feel heard, they take ownership. And when ownership is shared, the culture strengthens. Silence might feel easier in the moment, but openness — expressed with care and fairness — is what keeps a community moving forward.

Teaching and Learning Bulletin
Using reflective moments to share, evidence, and enhance our practice In a previous Teaching and Learning seminar, we explored reflection on action. This is the process of examining our teaching after the event to learn, refine, and grow. This week, we started to look at ways in which we can make the idea explicit and shareable. Our focus was on how we, as an academic team, can evidence and share our practice, where we shared the process of what we do, learn from each other, and think critically about how to make it better. In our session, we examined how reflection becomes meaningful when it’s linked to evidence of practice student work, feedback, classroom observations, and specifically examples of active learning in action. Our focus was about moving from “What did I teach?” to “How do I know my students learned?”. The seminar put forward the notion that once we start to engage with the practice or the idea of Donald Schön’s concept of reflection on action, is it then possible to share the moments of reflection and change amongst ourselves? What the seminar wanted to reach was answers to the following: The opportunity to share our work with our colleagues means that our reflection can become collaboration where there is a collective process of learning and improvement. Why does this matter? Across the sector, expectations from students in terms of what they want from their academic lecturers and from their studies have changed. Expectations for evidence-based teaching has also grown. Frameworks such as the BQA Review and the UK Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) both highlight the importance of demonstrating impact through student engagement and valuing teaching. At EUB, this means moving from describing the principles that underpin our teaching methods to showing their effectiveness. Our focus is on beginning to collect concrete “reflection on action” examples which are supported by videos, photographs, or annotated student work that capture how active learning strategies are used in practice. This not only helps us meet external expectations but, more importantly, strengthens our internal culture of professional learning. We believe that good teaching is framed through clear expectations, support, and a shared culture of continuous improvement. How can we do it in practice? Our seminar discussions centred on practical ways to make reflection visible and actionable: By embedding these cycles of evidence and reflection, we aim to find out if we can begin to see a clearer picture of our impact on students’ engagement, confidence, and skills. Sharing Good Practice at EUB As a teaching community, sharing is one of our most powerful tools for improvement. When colleagues talk about what works, show examples of activities, and reflect openly on challenges, we aim to begin to build a collective knowledge base that benefits us all. As a follow up to the seminar, the TLC will continue to develop opportunities for cross-disciplinary sharing, where colleagues can showcase their reflections and evidence in a supportive environment. The TLC will support academic faculties to: Our collective goal is to move beyond simply carrying out reflection to embedding a culture of inquiry, evidence, and professional collaboration across EUB. References Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books. EUB Teaching and Learning Centre (2025). Reflection on Action Seminar and Portfolio Framework.
Teaching and Learning Bulletin
Reflection on Action: Making Reflection a Shared Professional Practice During our Teaching and Learning seminar on Reflection on Action, colleagues explored what it means to pause, examine, and learn from our teaching experiences. Drawing on Donald Schön’s influential concept of reflection on action, we discussed how reflective practice can deepen our professional learning and shape our approach to teaching. What is Reflection on Action? Schön (1983) described reflection on action as the deliberate, critical examination of one’s practice after the event that is the process of looking back on what happened, analysing decisions made, and considering how they might inform future action. In a simplified framework, it’s about transforming experience into learning by asking: What happened? Why did it happen that way? What might I do differently next time? This form of reflection moves beyond instinctive reaction. It invites us to unpack the assumptions, strategies, and values that underpin our practice, revealing what Schön termed our “theory-in-use” which are the implicit or unspoken principles that guide our teaching decisions. As Harrison (2012) notes, it is through a framework of reflection that teachers begin to build genuine professional knowledge and move from technical reflection (“what went wrong?”) toward critical reflection (“why do I teach this way, and to what end?”). Why Does It Matter? Teaching is dynamic, and our academic sessions are full of moments that deserve a second look. Reflection on action allows us to transform these moments into insights. It helps us frame and reframe our understanding of teaching challenges and reminds us that learning to teach is an ongoing, evolving process. Critically, reflective practice also prevents teaching from becoming routine or mechanical. As Schön warned, when reflection-in-action (the decisions made in the moment) is not followed by reflection-on-action, professional knowledge can become stagnant. Instead, engaging in structured reflection which is improved when supported by dialogue with peers can create a space for growth and innovation. During our seminar, colleagues where able to discuss the implications of the theory as well as teaching experiences, questioning not only what worked but why it worked, and how student responses might have been shaped by our choices. How Can We Make It Work in Practice? In higher education, reflective practice can take many forms from informal conversations after class to structured peer review or written reflection. What matters is that reflection is purposeful, evidence-informed, and dialogic rather than solitary. At EUB, we are beginning to frame reflection on action through three complementary modes: These stages mirror Harrison’s (2012) conception of professional reflection as a movement from noticing and analysing towards transforming one’s understanding of practice. In our seminar, participants explored this progression by working through Schön’s What? So What? Now What? model a simple way of structuring reflection. Reflection and Professional Learning Reflection is most effective when it is shared. Schön himself cautioned against what he called “echo chambers of self-limiting reflection,” arguing that professional growth happens through dialogue and collaboration. This resonates strongly with the collegial culture we are building at EUB. By engaging with each other’s experiences in seminar sessions, peer observations, or informal discussions we aim to improve our individual practice but also contribute to collective professional learning. How the Teaching and Learning Centre Can Support You The Teaching and Learning Centre at EUB supports staff in embedding reflective practice across their teaching. We offer structured opportunities to engage in reflection through our seminar series, peer learning groups, and individual consultations. Our goal is to make reflection a sustained, shared process helping you to analyse your practice, identify areas for development, and experiment with new strategies. Schön’s notion of reflection on action reminds us that teaching develops through inquiry, experimentation, and continual adaptation. References Harrison, J. (2012) Professional Learning and the Reflective Practitioner. In Dymoke, S. (ed.) Reflective Practice and Professional Development in Education. Sage Publications. Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
Teaching and Learning Bulletin
Learning Outcomes: Linking Constructive Alignment and Employability Skills I recently led a Teaching and Learning seminar that focused on how we write, use, and reflect on learning outcomes. The session explored constructive alignment (Biggs and Tang 2011) and how our learning outcomes can do more than list intentions. Learning outcomes should become active tools for designing meaningful learning experiences. In addition to this we looked at ways we can complement good learning outcomes in ways that help our students develop employability skills alongside academic knowledge. What are learning outcomes? Learning outcomes articulate what students should be able to do, demonstrate, or understand by the end of a session, module, or programme. Biggs and Tang (2011) describe constructive alignment as the process of ensuring that learning outcomes, learning activities, and assessments work together in an integrated way to support deep, active learning.In the seminar we focused on the framework, thinking about the following questions: When these three questions align, the outcome verbs (“explain”, “analyse”, “apply”) drive the learning design. Activities should engage the same verbs, and assessments should allow students to demonstrate them. As the presentation and ppt slides aimed to emphasize “learning is about what the student does, not what we as teachers do”. Why does this matter? The concept of constructive alignment is influential in higher education because it connects curriculum design directly to student learning. However, as Loughlin, Lygo-Baker, and Lindberg-Sand (2021) note, alignment should not be treated as a bureaucratic exercise but reclaimed as a professional tool that helps lecturers think deeply about the purpose and coherence of their teaching. When learning outcomes are genuinely student-centred, they become more than statements for quality assurance validation. Learning outcomes help clarify the intent of a module, guide student engagement, and make assessment transparent. Most importantly, I believe they allow us to build in transferable and employability skills that prepare students for life beyond the classroom. How can we seek to integrate Learning Outcomes and employability skills in practice? The simple answer here is to make explicit what it implicit in the actions and activities our students participate in. As lecturers we can raise awareness in our students of the type of activity or task they are doing and how this links to employability skills. It gives purpose to the task. Our discussions during the session showed that constructive alignment is most effective when it is lived in the design of classroom activities. For example, in the Law Unit 1 session, lecturers explored how the verbs used in outcomes (“explain”, “discuss”, “analyse”) could guide activity design that develops specific employability skills. Some examples included: Each of these activities supports both the intended learning outcome and a transferable skill such as collaboration, problem-solving, or communication. In turn this aligns academic learning with employability development. Embedding employability skills through outcomes Employability at EUB is not an add-on but integral to our graduate journey. By writing outcomes that reflect both disciplinary knowledge and transferable skills, we can show students how classroom learning connects to the competencies valued by employers and society. For instance: Through constructive alignment, the learning outcomes we select and the activities we design to support them can explicitly nurture the attributes and employability skills we value across the university. How the Teaching and Learning Centre can support you As the seminar aimed to demonstrate The Teaching and Learning Centre works with academic staff to refine and align learning outcomes, teaching activities, and assessment design. We provide guidance on writing outcomes that integrate both academic and employability dimensions, as well as workshops and peer-sharing sessions that showcase effective practice. Constructive alignment is not a checklist. It is a way of thinking about teaching that aligns learning and skills development. By consciously aligning our outcomes, activities, and assessments, we not only make our teaching more coherent but also empower students to become active, employable learners ready to shape their own futures. In future seminars, we will continue to explore ways of connecting constructive alignment with employability frameworks, ensuring that our students can clearly see the skills they develop through their studies. References: Biggs, J, and Tang C. (2011) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. 4. ed. SRHE and Open University Press Imprint. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. Loughlin, C, Lygo-Baker, S & Lindberg-Sand Å (2021) Reclaiming constructive alignment, European Journal of Higher Education, 11:2, 119-136, DOI: 10.1080/21568235.2020.1816197

What Do We Value in a University?
This week I’ve been attending education fairs and meeting prospective students and their families. It reminded me that to maximise an outcome you first need to know what you value. Some things are easy to see: certificates, facilities, rankings — and yes, the price. These matter, of course. But the deeper values are less visible, and yet far more decisive. Confidence. A student who leaves university believing in their ability to contribute, lead and adapt will go further than one who only collected credits. Connection. A certificate may open one door, but networks, internships and industry links open many more. Education must connect students to the world beyond the classroom. Capability. Employers don’t only ask “what did you study?” but “what can you do?” A certificate signals completion; but a portfolio demonstrates ability. Care. Support, encouragement and belonging. These are not extras — they are what sustain students through challenges and bring out their best. At Euro University of Bahrain, we have chosen to value confidence, connection, capability and care — because they are qualities that endure long after the visible milestones of university life are over. And so the question remains: when choosing a university, do we judge it by what is most visible — or by what is harder to see but lasts much longer — the outcome? In the end, perhaps the real measure of a university’s value is not what families pay, but who their sons and daughters become because they chose to study there.

Teaching and Learning Bulletin
Graduate Attributes: Exploring how our students shape their futures through skills, values, and reflection In this post, I wanted to share and reflect on a recent session with our new students focused on our Graduate Attributes. The students worked in small groups to discuss and consider the skills, values, and characteristics that underpin our five EUB Graduate Attributes. With plenty of post-it notes and a lively discussion, the session aimed to give students the opportunity to think about what our graduate attributes can mean to them personally, and how they can take ownership of them during their time at university What are EUB Graduate Attributes? Graduate attributes represent the essential skills, knowledge, and qualities that universities seek to cultivate so students can thrive both during and beyond their studies. At EUB we talk about five graduate attributes that we believe shape not only academic success, but also the kind of people and professionals our students become: Together, these attributes provide a framework for the kind of graduates we aspire to nurture: adaptable, innovative, and socially conscious leaders. Why do graduate attributes matter? Graduate attributes are more than abstract ideals. Research and sector trends consistently highlight that employers and communities value not only subject expertise, but also critical thinking, digital literacy, cultural awareness, and social responsibility. For our students, these attributes open pathways to professional success and empower them to make meaningful contributions to society. By working actively with the attributes during their studies students begin to see how their academic and extracurricular experiences interconnect, shaping both who they are now and who they are becoming. How can we bring attributes to life in practice? Our recent session provided a clear example. In small groups, students explored each attribute, noting the skills, behaviours, and values they believed were most relevant. Post-it notes clustered around each attribute raised awareness and attention as well as capturing a range of insights: • Problem-solving means not just finding answers, but asking better questions. • Social responsibility is about small everyday choices as well as big community projects. • Being globally aware includes listening to peers from other cultures right here at EUB. This collaborative, interactive format encouraged students to define attributes in their own words and recognise them in their everyday academic and personal lives. As lecturers, we can build on this approach by embedding graduate attributes into our curriculum, our seminar sessions, assessment activities, and feedback conversations — helping students continually connect their active engagement in different sessions with the wider global community they participate in. Graduate Attributes and the Falcon Award At EUB, we are taking the opportunity to encourage students to explicitly engage with our Graduate Attributes. The Graduate Attributes have been embedded into our Falcon Graduate Attribute Award. This award will recognise students who demonstrate high engagement with the attributes through self-awareness and reflection. Working towards the award involves: Students who complete the process receive a certificate and LinkedIn badge, formal recognition that enhances their employability and professional profile. More importantly, they gain confidence in articulating the value of their EUB education, both to themselves and to future employers. The role of the Teaching and Learning Centre The Teaching and Learning Centre collaborates with staff across EUB to embed graduate attributes meaningfully into teaching, learning, and assessment. We provide training, guidance, and opportunities to innovate in curriculum design, helping colleagues align their modules with the attribute framework. During the academic year, we will also run seminar sessions where staff can share practice, and students can showcase how they are developing the attributes through their studies and extracurricular activities. Together, these conversations ensure that graduate attributes remain a living, dynamic part of our ethos, not just a list of words. Graduate Attributes embedded in EUB teaching practice The session with the students reminded me that when students are invited to actively engage with our graduate attributes, they bring fresh perspectives and a strong sense of ownership. As staff, we have the opportunity to harness that energy, embedding attributes across all aspects of the student journey. I hope this reflection sparks conversations in your teaching teams. If you would like to explore further how graduate attributes can be integrated into your modules or how your students can participate in the Falcon Graduate Attribute Award please connect with us at the Teaching and Learning Centre. Together, we can ensure that our graduates leave EUB with not only academic excellence but also the confidence, skills, and values to shape a better future.

Teaching and Learning Bulletin
Placing our students at the heart of the learning process. Active Learning: what it is, why it matters Welcome to this edition of our Teaching and Learning Bulletin (now shared as a blog).Our aim is to offer ideas and approaches that can enrich our students’ learning experiences and encourage us to look at our teaching and learning practices from fresh perspectives. Building on discussions from our recent Teaching and Learning session during staff induction week, I’d like to continue embedding into our Teaching and Learning ethos the concept of active learning. This is an approach that places our students at the heart of the learning process. As a reminder of what we explored together, you’ll find below an overview of what active learning is, why it matters, and how we can begin to embed it meaningfully in our classrooms. What is active learning? Active learning places students at the centre of the educational process. Instead of sitting back as information is passively provided to them, students are encouraged to interact with content through tasks that require reflection, application, and collaboration. This approach is grounded in constructivist learning theory, which recognises that learners build new knowledge by connecting it to what they already know (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 1999). Social constructivism, as articulated by Vygotsky (1978), adds that learning is shaped through interaction — reinforcing the value of collaborative and cooperative environments in our classrooms. In practice, active learning can take on many forms from pair work and structured discussions, group problem-solving, debates, to case studies and case-based tasks. What matters is that students are thinking with the material, not just about it. Why does active learning matter? There is a growing body of evidence showing the impact of active learning. Freeman et al. (2014) found that it significantly improves student performance and reduces failure rates compared to traditional lectures. Similarly, Prince (2004) and Michael (2006) argue that active learning not only promotes deeper understanding but also develops the transferable skills our graduates will need. Importantly, the purpose of active learning goes beyond content mastery. It fosters critical thinking, problem-solving, and metacognitive awareness (Anderson et al., 2005; Kember & Leung, 2005). It also creates a more inclusive, motivating environment that benefits students from diverse backgrounds (Eddy & Hogan, 2014; Theobald et al., 2020). When students feel engaged and supported, they are more likely to take ownership of their learning. How can we make active learning work? While the benefits are clear, successful active learning requires intentional planning and facilitation. As lecturers, this means designing learning environments that encourage participation, risk-taking, and reflection. Activities should be aligned to learning outcomes and structured in ways that scaffold students’ engagement, giving them the confidence to participate fully. It can be tempting to see active learning as a single strategy or activity. In reality, it is a mindset that places our students as active participants in constructing their own learning journeys. This said, on the TLC Moodle page you will find practical examples of active learning. These examples range from project-based assignments where students participate in real-life assignments, to in-class activities that encourage students to remain engaged and active during lectures and seminars. These types of activities include using online survey tools, like Kahoots, to present concept checking questions during the lecture or prompt discussion at the beginning of a session to raise awareness of misconceptions, shared understanding and individual knowledge. The examples also include think-pair-share questions that students can participate with during and towards the end of academic sessions. How the Teaching and Learning Centre can support you The Teaching and Learning Centre collaborates with you to provide training, support and guidance to help you plan, innovate and develop your use of active learning activities and techniques. Our aim is to work alongside you as you explore and embed new approaches in your teaching. Throughout the academic year, we will run seminar sessions that bring colleagues together to share and learn from one another’s practice. These sessions will highlight different ways in which active learning can enhance our students’ experiences — from fostering deeper understanding to building their confidence and independence as learners. By connecting theory with lived practice, and by learning from each other, we can build a vibrant, collaborative culture of active learning across our classrooms. Moving Forward As always, we hope this piece prompts fresh conversations in your teams and inspires you to try something new. If you would like to explore active learning further or discuss how it might work in your own teaching context, please do get in touch with us at the Teaching and Learning Centre, come along to our regular seminars or put your name forward to run a seminar in collaboration with us. Let’s continue to learn from and with each other as we shape rich, engaging learning environments for our students. Some Useful References: Anderson, W.A., Mitchell, S.M. and Osgood, M.P., 2005. Comparison of student performance in cooperative learning and traditional lecture-based biochemistry classes. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 33(6), pp.387–393. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. and Cocking, R.R., 1999. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Brame, C.J., 2016. Active learning. Vanderbilt University Center for Teaching. Available at: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/active-learning/ Eddy, S.L. and Hogan, K.A., 2014. Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), pp.453–468. Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. and Wenderoth, M.P., 2014. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), pp.8410–8415. Kember, D. and Leung, D.Y.P., 2005. The influence of active learning experiences on the development of graduate capabilities. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), pp.155–170. Kozanitis, A. & Nenciovici, L., 2023. Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: A meta-analysis. Higher Education, 86, pp.547–569. Michael, J., 2006. Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4),

The Lessons That Come From Getting It Wrong
In education, as in leadership, we tend to celebrate what goes right. The project that succeeds. The idea that works. The outcome that matches the plan. But often, it’s the times we get it wrong that shape us most. Why We Resist Mistakes Psychologists call it cognitive dissonance: the discomfort of facing evidence that doesn’t match how we see ourselves. A leader who doubles down on a failing strategy because changing course would feel like weakness. A student who hides a mistake on an assignment instead of asking for help, missing the chance to learn. But the cost is the same: it shuts down the very learning that could move us forward. Evidence, Not Embarrassment James Dyson’s story is often told for good reason. He tested more than 5,000 prototypes before producing the vacuum that made his name. Every “failure” mattered. Each one was evidence — data that guided the next attempt. The same pattern holds in research, in leadership and in our classrooms. Progress is rarely linear. It comes through iteration: trying, adjusting, persisting. The Role of Leaders The question, then, is less about whether mistakes happen, and more about how we respond. In too many organisations, errors are hidden for fear they will be punished. But when leaders are candid about their own missteps, they set a different tone. They create space for others to take risks, to share openly, and to learn quickly. That is where innovation takes root. A Shift in Perspective Thomas Edison once put it simply: “I have not failed. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” At Euro University of Bahrain, we try to give students the same perspective. Mistakes are not proof of incompetence. They are steps on the path to improvement. Final Thought We admire those who can say, “I was wrong, you were right.” It doesn’t diminish them. It builds trust. Getting it wrong is not the end of the story. More often than not, it is where the real learning begins.